ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | CURRENT ISSUE | OUR LAST ISSUE | LINKS | E-MAIL EDITOR | HOME
Disability Rights Nation
|
|
A two-day symposium on "Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): Problems for Science and Society" to be held August 25 and 26 in Boston will not be accessible to people with MCS itself. Dr. Amy Brown, co-organizer of the conference responding to an email query about access for presenters, wrote that "concerning 'accessibility' for MCS individuals... I do not believe it would be possible to try to implement [such] a policy..." Brown, Associate Professor of Entomology at University of Maryland, is organizing the conference through the American Chemical Society as part of its annual meeting, with co-sponsorship by the Society's divisions of Agrochemicals and Chemical Health and Safety. Brown cited the number of people who would attend the conference, her lack of involvement in planning the details and ACS' inability to "dictate terms to the hotel(s)" as reasons for her inattention to MCS access. When challenged by a potential presenter with examples of previous scientific conferences that have made MCS accommodations - and with the ethical implications of excluding the people who would be most affected by the conference's outcome - Brown responded, "Creating this kind of open forum for scientists to exchange research results, rather than opinions ... will benefit the MCS community at large." Brown reiterated that the goal of the conference was "to investigate the current state of the science surrounding multiple chemical sensitivity and to examine related societal repercussions" (one of the four sessions will focus on "societal implications"). A person with MCS interested in presenting sociological research on the impact of industry-funded research on the lives of people with MCS was told that her topic was not relevant to the conference: "Our primary purpose in organizing this symposium is to provide ... a broad view of current research, serving as a forum for scientific discussion," Brown said, although in another part of her letter, Brown noted that ACS was "specifically encouraging participation" not only "by scientists currently conducting original research in this field," but also by "persons involved in making policy decisions for agencies, institutions, etc." As Ragged Edge went to press, there had been no reported change in Brown's position. That a conference organized by the industry that has worked to discredit people with MCS should exclude people with the most relevant research - life experience -comes as no surprise to MCS activists. Conference organizers' ignorance and hostility toward MCS access, combined with contradictory claims of being concerned only with "objective science" while inviting discussion on "societal implications" casts serious doubt on the usefulness of the conference to people with chemical injuries, they say. The ACS is the world's largest scientific society, with over 150,000 members. The chemical industry has not been a friend to people with MCS nor to objective science on chemical injury, reportedly hiring public relations firms to propagate the idea that MCS is psychogenic and funding research to show that people with MCS are "hysterical." - Reporting by Sharon Wachsler |
ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | CURRENT ISSUE | OUR LAST ISSUE | LINKS | E-MAIL EDITOR | HOME
© Copyright 1998 The Ragged Edge
This Website produced by Cliffwood Organic Works