I just finished reading your cover story "Bad
Sports" (September/October). Bravo! We have a club under the hearing
NGB and so far have been supported as to coaching and training! But
I know that if it came down to a 100% support of a deaf wrestling team
to compete equally that we would have possible conflict!
There needs to be more progress!
USA Deaf Wrestling
I was a member of that exhibition race in 1984 and it was very important.
But you are exactly right: it is time for action. Randy Snow
I found your article on the United States Olympic Committee a little
one-sided. You need to take a little time interview people who appreciate
the USOC's support of disability sports as well as looking at the real
reasons, including lack of numbers, poor training and the relatively
short time disability sports has been involved in the USOC.
When compared to the struggle women and minorities went through to
get an equal place at USOC, disability sport is doing well.
How many Disabled Sports Organizations would be operating if it were
not for USOC funds?
Add all the active athletes in all 5 Paralympic DSOs and I believe
you will see it is less than the smallest of the 34 NGBs.
Should the USOC give more? Absolutely! Is it right that none of that
grant money was set aside for Paralympic athletes? Absolutely not! But
there are two sides to every story, and the USOC is changing for the
I hope you will consider doing a follow-up story and spend some time
talking to a more representative group of people.
Silence on Title II ruling
I have contacted a lot of people
within the disability movement about the recent Circuit Court decisions
Title II Ruled Unconstitutional in 8th Circuit; Supreme Court case likely,"
D.R. Nation, September/October) but the silence out there is overwhelming.
The only people who are covering the issue seem to be you and Adrienne
Barhydt from the Disability Rights Activist.
How does this affect people in the trenches? At a recent educational
conference, I spoke up" Say, what do you think about the 8th Circuit
Court decisions ruling the ADA and 504 are unconstitutional?" Most of
the folks sitting around the table did not know what I was talking about.
The Disability Rights Activist is an online publication available
at http://www.disrights.org ‹
Cruel, evil trickery
That "Declaration of Disability Rights" you published on page 4 of
your Sept./Oct. issue is cruel, cold evil trickery. It will be signed
by many beautiful people who will be put to death against their wishes
someday by "someone appropriately authorized." Legally.
These beautiful people who signed have been duped and trapped in the
net of those who want to do away with them because the are seen as a
burden or cost to others: absolute genocide!
The Holocaust was not so evil.
You have done grave harm.
A former friend
I read with great interest Carol
Cleigh's story about giving tickets ("A
Volunteer Ticketing Program ‹ From the Volunteer's Perspective," May/June).
I am a nondisabled person. I wonder if you could get a law passed which
would allow you to park behind someone who is illegally parked in a
blue spot and block them in. (I'm not being completely serious, but...)
My neighbor's husband is disabled, and she does all her shopping using
the blue spots without him in the car. Would it help if the photo of
the person to whom the card was issued were on both sides of the rearview
Grey Area 'misguided'
I stumbled upon the websites
mentioned in Mary Wilt's article ("Web
sites 'a paean to eugenics.'" July/August, 1998) quite by accident.
Like Mary Wilt, I, too am the mom of three children. My two oldest
were given a label that most parents would be proud of ‹ "gifted". They
attend a special class called GATE (Gifted And Talented Education).
I suppose some mad geneticist somewhere would want to clone them ‹ or
at least confer upon them the right to have children in this terribly
overpopulated world. My youngest has a different story. She has Down
What I surfed into when I found The Grey Area website gave me chills,
but also filled me with sorrow, because I sense that the "Angels" parents'
statements came from terrible grief.
We parents of living disabled children heal as we accept the new member
of our family; many of us even learn about human diversity. I don't
sense this from the Grey Area parents. What I do sense is a feeling
of hopelessness about the lives of disabled people. These parents say
that they "had to" terminate their pregnancies because they knew before
their children's births that their Down's kids "would never walk or
talk." One visitor to the site wrote online that she had worked with
the Special Olympics: "I hold no illusions about these people," she
wrote. I hope this person won't be my daughter's coach someday!
I wrote to the Grey Area's webmaster to express my feelings from the
other side of this issue. She wrote a curt letter back: "like it or
not, we all deserve support." I agree, but, like it or not, her website
has frightening implications for disabled people and their right to
exist. It may be an attempt to heal grief, but it's misguided.
The Hunchback of Notre Dame (referred to in the story "Controlling
Risk -- or Controlling Us?" in our last issue) was written by Victor
Back to home