'Is this a disability rights case?'
by Alan Toy
Much has been said and written about the Terri Schiavo case lately. Many in the disability community have rallied to save Terri from starvation, while others of us have watched uncomfortably as this is made into a momentous struggle for survival. This issue is a divide among us that can become painful, if not argued carefully, using our heads as well as our hearts. There is a tendency in the disability community to address policy issues around the independent living, self-directed lives from a highly charged emotional perspective.
I can't say that I fully agree with this approach, but it certainly is understandable. I too get "flooded" with emotion over little injustices, like able-bodied people parking in spots reserved for people with disabilities who have identifying placards. I have done some stupid things in my time too, such as running my wheelchair push rim or keys along the nicely painted sides of such people's vehicles.
So, I can absolutely understand the emotions behind right to die (or live) cases like Terri Schiavo's. But they are mostly emotional rather than intellectual arguments. And in this particular case, I'm having a lot of difficulty understanding its relevance to things I strive for every day as an activist.
Many have cast the Schiavo case as a classic disability rights case, pointing their fingers accusingly at any who dare to disagree. Terri's case is made more difficult by the surrounding circumstances that include family rights and seem to indicate financial conflicts of interest. And in the midst of a highly volatile family battle, the Florida legislature, Governor Jeb Bush the Christian right and many in the disability leadership, among others, have all joined the fray. All purport to know what is "best" for Terri Schiavo, a woman who, according to her doctors, has lost most of her cerebral cortex.
These "friends of Terri" say, among other things, that she could be "trained" to eat, or that her husband is only interested in her money, or worse, that he may have been somehow involved in her heart attack, which was caused by a potassium deficiency. They say she "communicates" with her parents and visitors, that she responds to questions and that she "bolted upright" when told, by phone that she was to be taken off her feeding tube.
They also question the motives and credentials of every professional who opines that Terri is indeed in an unconscious state and incapable of purpose or decision-making, which is at the center of all disability rights issues, i. e., choice.
Back to Terri Schiavo and the Disability Rights Movement
ABOUT US | SUBSCRIBE | LINKS | E-MAIL EDITOR | HOME
© Copyright 2003 Ragged Edge Magazine
This Website produced by Cliffwood Organic Works